Monit python9/13/2023 ![]() ![]() Among the evidence Wade cites is the note scrawled on the bottom of one page that reads, "By me, Richard Heege, because I was at that feast and did not have a drink"-implying that Heege was sober enough to write about a minstrel's performance at said feast. But he thinks the Heege manuscript was either a transcript of a live minstrel performance or copied from a minstrel's now-lost written notes (an aide-memoire). While there are many medieval works with "oral" or "minstrel" tags, per Wade, "No single text survives that we can confidently tether to a medieval minstrel, as composer, owner, or performer." Wade is careful to emphasize that he is not claiming the discovery of a manuscript actually written by a medieval minstrel. Most are records of payments made to minstrels, listed by their first names and instruments played. Fictional minstrels are frequently mentioned in medieval literature, but according to Wade, it's rare to find a reference to a real minstrel, and there are few, if any, written records of them. Minstrels in the Middle Ages traveled from town to town, amusing the people in baronial halls, taverns, and fairs with their performances. Heege's manuscript, with its inclusion of low-brow nonsense verse, a mock sermon, and a burlesque romance, "gives us the rarest glimpse of a medieval world rich in oral storytelling and popular entertainments,” said Wade. The scribe identified himself in the text as Richard Heege, a household cleric and tutor to the Sherbrooke family of Derbyshire. Killer rabbits might even have been a common trope among traveling minstrels, according to one scholar's discovery of a written record of a live performance preserved in a 15th-century manuscript, which also includes one of the earliest recorded uses of the phrase "red herring." Cambridge University's James Wade, author of a recent paper published in The Review of English Studies, stumbled across the manuscript while doing research in the National Library of Scotland. In fact, the Python crew drew inspiration for their version from a scene on the facade of Notre Dame in Paris, depicting a knight fleeing a rabbit. Killer rabbits are a kind of mainstay of medieval literature, featuring prominently in marginal illustrations, as well as a mention in Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales. One of many standout scenes in the 1975 classic Monty Python and the Holy Grailfeatures King Arthur and his knights facing down the Killer Rabbit of Caerbannog, a seemingly innocuous bunny who soon proves to be a devastating adversary, forcing the knights to retreat ("Run away! Run away!"). So if your python starts with pid 100 and got killed anyhow, but another process takes pid 100, your Monit will not notice it and thinks everything is fine.YouTube/University of Cambridge reader comments 163 with Monit has no connection between pid-file and binary. The biggest flaw with this approach would be the possible reuse of pids. If 3 restarts within 5 cycles then unmonitor Stop program = "/monit/MyProgram-kill" as uid MyNonRootUserHere Start program = "/monit/MyProgram-daemonize" as uid myNonRootUserHere You can use check process then: check process MyProgram pidfile "/tmp/MyProgram.pid" I used kill -SIGTERM, because kill -SIGKILL or kill -9 are evil ) You might have to adjust this.I used /tmp/ instead of /run for permission reasons.There is something unusual happening if status "/tmp/MyProgram.pid"Īnd another one ( /monit/MyProgram-kill): #!/usr/bin/env bash.You need to daemonize your script for that. I think that you need to go for check process in this case. You are trying to use check program to daemonize your application. You can then, based on status-code, contents, etc., react to the result/output of the execution. Example: du -hd1 will run, create an output, and exit. This program should exit after some time and Monit reacts on how all that was going. Example: systemctl start nginx will not run a nginx in foreground (and block your bash), but will start a daemon in background (that keeps running even after you killed your session).Ī program is a binary executed and controlled by Monit. It can, however, interact with the daemon-izer. ![]() Monit does not really control those applications. There is a significant difference between a process and a program in Monit:Ī process is a binary running in the background - a daemon (like an HTTPd, a DB Server, etc.).Ī process is not run by Monit. If the program is running and for some reason it stops with an exit code other than 0 the monit will not restart it (see my configuration below). (sorry for the long answer in advance ^^)īut when I use check program Monit will not automatically start it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |